As links reveal, this post coheres with efforts to find foundations for divine command morality. A factor of my motivation for understanding morality as based on divine commands is to understand retributive punishment. I believed that retributive punishment is crucial to understand the Christian world view that evil has been introduced by God’s creatures which God in His love for His creatures will correct. A Christian world view is a plausible account of what it would be like for line 11 below to be true.
A significant challenge to prevailing secular world views would be showing that an intelligible line of thought in philosophical theology leads to claims well explained by the Christian world view. Lines (1) through (10) below are philosophical theology. If I were to document sources for any of these lines, I would cite historical figures recognized as philosophers and not as theologians for any particular religious tradition. If I would cite sources on how to develop line (11) I would cite scriptures and theologians such as Church Fathers. I should be citing sources because I do not want to claim any originality for what I write. I admit originality only for what is not worth taking seriously. Perhaps, line (1), then, is original. Still, I believe line (1) is correct.
1. We cannot imagine experiencing reality without physical and moral evil.
2. If God is omnipotent, all good and the sole creator of reality, then reality is without physical and moral evil.
3. So, if God is omnipotent, all good and the sole creator of reality, then reality of which God is the sole creator is a reality which we cannot imagine experiencing.
4. We can, because of our experience, only too well imagine experiencing reality with physical and moral evil.
5. So, God is either not omnipotent or not all good or not the sole creator of the reality as we experience reality.
6. If God exists, God is omnipotent and all good.
7. God exists .
8. Hence, God is not the sole creator of reality as we experience it.
9. If God is not the sole creator of reality as we experience it , then the other creators are less than God and have been created with God’s permission to be subsidiary creators of reality as we experience it.
10. If God has delegated creation of reality as we experience it to subsidiary creators, He had a good reason for delegating creative activity and has a good reason for correcting the experienced reality produced by susidiary creators.
11. So, ultimately there will be a correction of reality as we experience it although we cannot imagine experiencing it!
Some remarks on the lines of the argument:
On line (1): An observation in a homily by my pastor, Fr, Matthew Hoover, gave me the insight that we pose the problem of evil but have no clear idea of what would solve it.
On line 9: I have sketched out how Satan could be the primary subsidiary creator.