Nullus diabolus, nullus redemptor<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n This is a draft Preface for a short e-book on the rationality of professing the reality of a devil – Satan. I will be preparing the first draft of this booklet in a series of blog posts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Why use “professing” rather than “believing?” I make claims implying the reality of Satan primarily as part of endorsing the belief system of the Catholic Church. I rarely think of Satan in my religious life, moral life; let alone in my day-to-day practical affairs. However, my not denying the reality of Satan and professing that Satan exists is more than only professing Satan’s reality with my lips without believing it in my heart. Honesty requires preparing myself to let events bring it about that the reality of Satan is, for me, a sincerely held religious belief. In Mere Christianity,<\/em> C.S.Lewis makes it clear that belief in Satan is basic in Christianity. Dismissing Satan as an outdated superstition implies that Jesus as portrayed in the Gospels was a superstitious fool. Believing Jesus to be ignorant and superstitious, is incompatible with professing a Christian religion. I would become a better Christian and, perhaps, morally better if belief in Satan became more significant in my religious and daily life.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We cannot have obligations to do what we cannot do. “Ought” implies “can.” We cannot simply choose to belief; especially on a religious topic. Faith has to be given: by God or life experiences. We can, however, choose to prepare ourselves to receive a gift of faith. What is it to prepare for faith? There may be many ways. The mathematician and philosopher, Pascal, proposed a religious way. But at least learn your inability to believe, since reason brings you to this, and yet you cannot believe. Endeavor then to convince yourself, not by increase of proofs of God, but by the abatement of your passions. You would like to attain faith, and do not know the way; you would like to cure yourself of unbelief and ask the remedy for it. Learn of those who have been bound like you, and who now stake all their possessions. These are people who know the way which you would follow, and who are cured of an ill of which you would be cured. Follow the way by which they began; by acting as if they believed, taking the holy water, having masses said, etc. Even this will naturally make you believe, and deaden your acuteness. (Pense III 233)<\/p>\n\n\n\n I take an explicitly philosophical way: Construction of an ontology. One way is to profess what is to be believed all the while trying to construct a model of what it would be like for the belief to be true.\u201cThere are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy\u201d is from William Shakespeare\u2019s play Hamlet. It is spoken by the title character, Hamlet, in Act I, Scene 5<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n This booklet outlines my preparing myself for openess to genuine belief in the reality of Satan. <\/p>\n\n\n\n This is an essay in the philosophy of religion. In philosophy of religion a major task is to show how crucial religious beliefs can be held without superstition or fanaticism. So, the task of this booklet is to show that people can let themselves become convinced of the reality of Christian religiously adequate notion Satan, without superstition or fanticism. However, there is no scholarly work showing that my outline of what it might be like for there to be a devil conforms to theological and dogmatic claims about Satan. I have recently read two books on Satan which I am sure have influenced me although I do not cite them as sources. The books are Robert J. Spitzer’s Christ vs. Satan in Our Daily Lives: The Cosmic Struggle Between Good and Evil (Called Out of Darkness: Contending with Evil Through The Church, Virtue and Prayer,) <\/strong> Ignatius Press, San Francisco, 2020 and Jeffrey Burton Russell’s , Prince of Darkness: Radical Evil and the Power of Good in History,<\/strong> Cornell U Press, Ithaca NY. 2016. Spitzer’s empirical case for the reality of Satan requires showing how a conceptual model of Satan, a model abstracted from what we can imagine experiencing, allows for people experiencing the phenomena for which a contender for best explanation is demonic possession. Russell does not argue for the reality of Satan. However, he reminds us that there is no established metaphysical scheme that prohibts us from trying to develop a notion of Satan as an explanation for the facts that there seem to be evil done simply for the sake of evil, viz., radical evil.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n The second purpose of this post is list links to previous posts on the reality and nature of a Devil. I develop these posts to draft chapters for the booklet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n A December 2022 post points out that the problem of evil leads to an assumption of a created evil creator in oppostion to God<\/p>\n\n\n\n <h4>The Problem of Evil as the Cornerstone of a Christian World View <\/h4><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n <h4> The Value of Conceptual Models of Satan <\/h4><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <h4> Seriously: Have We Been Rescued From Satan? <\/h4><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <h4> Pope Francis on the Role of Satan in Sexual Abuse<\/h4><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Why Does Satan Want Us to Go to Hell?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n What Is Satan\u2019s Sin?<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n <h4>There is a Satan In Opposition To God!<\/h4><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n God cannot destroy Satan<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <h4>The Transcendent vs Nothing<\/h4><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p>\n\n\n\n Therefore the real question is whether the concept of Quotations from: Jeffrey Burton Russell\u2019s ,\u00a0Prince of Darkness: Radical Evil and the Power of Good in History,<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Inflicting suffering for the sake of suffering, doing evil for evil’s sake, the Often people assume that in the modern world the idea of the Devil is Whether or not the Devil exists outside the human mind, the concept In this way, the Devil is defined by the historical tradition. Efforts to <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Nullus diabolus, nullus redemptor This is a draft Preface for a short e-book on the rationality of professing the reality of a devil – Satan. I will be preparing the first draft of this booklet in a series of blog posts. Why use “professing” rather than “believing?” I make claims implying the reality of Satan … Continue reading <\/p>\n <\/span>
the Devil makes any sense p, 2 See posts on Overview of Posts Confronting Nihilism<\/a>satan<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Devil is by definition the personification of cosmic evil p2<\/p>\n\n\n\n
old-fashioned and therefore false-an objection that assumes that “the
modern world” (however defined) has discovered some metaphysical
truth (however defined) that makes the existence of the Devil less likely
now than it used to 2<\/p>\n\n\n\n
of the Devil has a long history and the most fruitful approach to it is
historical. p. 4<\/p>\n\n\n\n
say that the Devil “really” is something different from the historical
tradition are self-contradictory p 4<\/p>\n\n\n\nPreface: Rationality of Belief in Satan<\/h4>\n