This brief post applies a post from May 2021, Truth of Spiritual Claims<\/a> to my previous post of December 2021. Here, however, I write of supernatural reality instead of spiritual reality.<\/p>\n It is a fallacy to conclude from “Reality – what exists – is one” that “There is only one kind of existent in reality.” There are no rules of careful thinking which show that someone who thinks Luke’s account of the Annunciation is an assertion of what happened believes in a fiction. I think Luke’s account speaks of what was and how it was a couple of thousand years ago in Nazareth. To emphasize: I say “Luke’s account is true” to express my intention to endorse Luke’s account as a correct account of reality.<\/p>\n Of course, an angel speaking and a virginal conception are not normal or natural occurrences. So, careful critical thinking requires distinguishing then from the normal or natural. Depending upon a person’s intellectual standards and those of communities of people whose approval he wants, distinguishing these non-normal events from normal events requires careful distinctions which are probably of no interest to the vast majority of people.<\/p>\n A product of this careful thinking is to specify the distinction between what one asserts with religious faith from attempts to describe and explain what normally exists as a distinction between talking of supernatural instead of natural reality. <\/strong><\/p>\n Careful critical thinking does not endorse presenting this distinction as between the real and unreal.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" This brief post applies a post from May 2021, Truth of Spiritual Claims to my previous post of December 2021. Here, however, I write of supernatural reality instead of spiritual reality. It is a fallacy to conclude from “Reality – what exists – is one” that “There is only one kind of existent in reality.” … Continue reading <\/p>\n <\/span> Reality of the Supernatural <\/h4>\n