{"id":2071,"date":"2021-08-12T11:59:51","date_gmt":"2021-08-12T15:59:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/charleskielkopf.com\/?p=2071"},"modified":"2021-08-12T11:59:51","modified_gmt":"2021-08-12T15:59:51","slug":"the-transcendent-s-immanent-moral-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/charleskielkopf.com\/?p=2071","title":{"rendered":"<h4>The Transcendent\u2019 s Immanent Moral Order <\/h4>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Transcendent\u2019 s Immanent Moral Order <\/p>\n<p>This post introduces a model of authoritarian morality as the moral order of theoretical reason\u2019s Transcendent. As such, it can be fairly labeled a model of divine command morality. The model is a construct of theoretical reason about the moral use of practical reason. For theoretical reason the ground of everything is transcendent; not in the world \u2013 not immanent.<\/p>\n<p> However, we have seen that theoretical reason can concede that what transcends theoretical reason need not transcend practical reason. We have also seen the inseparability of practical and theoretical reasoning. So, this model is a theory about a dimension of practical reason which may have direct contact with theoretical reason\u2019s Transcendent. This model can be legitimately influenced by the practical reasoning it characterizes and also influence the practical reasoning it characterizes. For instance, temptations to disobey the moral laws might lead to theorizing about their correctness just as theorizing about correctness might strengthen resistance to temptations.<\/p>\n<p>The above remarks are relevant for the case that the model is correct \u2013 presents the truth about correct human morality. There are three steps  to evaluating  a model of divine command morality. One: does it correctly represent a significant way in which humans think about morality? Two: What is it like for the commands of this moral thinking to come from a non-human source? Three: Is the non-human source the transcendent God?  <\/p>\n<p>In my series of posts outlining Authoritarian Morality, I have taken step one. Step three requires more detailed examination of practical reason. Theoretical reason cannot say that commands are those of the Transcendent because theoretical reason cannot speak of the Transcendent. So, theoretical reason can never complete a defense of divine command morality. Ultimately, proof that morality is based on divine commands comes  from practical reason \u201chearing\u201d the commands.<\/p>\n<p>In my next post, I take step two by positing authoritative moral thinking as existing  innately in human thinking. This way of  thinking is directly dependent upon the Transcendent and humans have a capacity to recognize the source of this way of thinking. The Transcendent&#8217;s  immanent moral order is built up by humans from innate capacities such as those for language and arithmetic. However, special features of moral thinking such as the universality of its laws and transparency lead to interpreting the constructions from this capacity as dependent on more than human work.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Transcendent\u2019 s Immanent Moral Order This post introduces a model of authoritarian morality as the moral order of theoretical reason\u2019s Transcendent. As such, it can be fairly labeled a model of divine command morality. The model is a construct of theoretical reason about the moral use of practical reason. For theoretical reason the ground &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/charleskielkopf.com\/?p=2071\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\"><\/p>\n<h4>The Transcendent\u2019 s Immanent Moral Order <\/h4>\n<p><\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[22,2],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/charleskielkopf.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2071"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/charleskielkopf.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/charleskielkopf.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/charleskielkopf.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/charleskielkopf.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2071"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/charleskielkopf.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2071\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2072,"href":"https:\/\/charleskielkopf.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2071\/revisions\/2072"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/charleskielkopf.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2071"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/charleskielkopf.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2071"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/charleskielkopf.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2071"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}